Pregnancy Update: Unexpected Appointments

Since the preg­nancy announce­ment post, we’ve had a rather event­ful 6 weeks. I’ve been extremely lucky (and thank­ful) to have had two rather sim­ple & unevent­ful preg­nan­cies with the boys. Other than start­ing out over weight, I’ve not had any issues or complications–not with the babies nor with me (not even ges­ta­tional dia­betes or high blood pres­sure). When I saw my Dr. just before post­ing the announce­ment, she said…“you’re so easy, I don’t even need to see you for 6 or 7 weeks”. Then, wouldn’t you know, things got inter­est­ing.

We had done an NT scan at about 12 weeks to check on baby (the ultra­sound is usu­ally done at peri­na­tal cen­ters with more advanced imag­ing tech­nol­ogy, so it wasn’t done at my Dr.‘s office). This wasn’t some­thing offered when I was preg­nant with Big Brother in 2006 (the only thing then was the first trimester screen blood test, which we opted not to do since it doesn’t tell you any­thing defin­i­tive), so when in 2009 we found out about being about to do a ultra­sound at that stage to check on baby–we jumped at the chance! As part of the screen­ing, there is the blood test too. Every­thing was great for Lit­tle Brother back then. So, with this preg­nancy we decided to do it again. And, once again, we were thrilled to see our newest lit­tle one at 12 weeks. Every­thing looked great on the ultrasound–no signs that would indi­cate a problem.

So, on our way out, I gave my few drops of blood & we left feel­ing really great. I met with my Dr. a few days later where we heard the heart­beat via doppler. Again, every­thing was great. So, I (naively) just didn’t pos­si­bly think that any­thing could would not look good with the blood work. But, then I got the call. It was the Dr. at the Perinatologist’s office (who had really BAD phone-side man­ner). Here’s what he said, “So, every­thing looked fine on the ultra­sound, but your blood work came back pos­i­tive for Down Syn­drome. Just based on age alone, your risk for Down Syn­drome is about 1 in 450, but based on the results of the ultra­sound and blood work, your risk is 1 in 60.…”

I was stunned. I asked about the other Tri­somies (namely Tri­somy 13 & 18–thankfully, those came back nor­mal). The biol­ogy per­son in me wanted to know what they tested in my blood and how the results were cal­cu­lated. He explained that they test for two chemicals/proteins present dur­ing prenancy–HCG and PAPP-A. Appar­ently, my HCG was slightly high (which is com­mon in babies with Down Syn­drome) and my PAPP-A num­ber was quite low (also com­mon for babies with Down Syn­drome). So, that’s why my risk was so much higher than just the aver­age risk for age alone. Then, he went on to say…“Low PAPP-A is also asso­ci­ated with pre-eclampsia later in the preg­nancy as well as a num­ber of pla­cen­tal issues that can lead to IUGR, preterm labor, mis­car­riage, etc. so you’re def­i­nitely going to be mon­i­tored more closely through­out the preg­nancy”. WHAT?! After that, he explained options to me (amnio, more blood tests, ultra­sounds, etc.), but at that point I couldn’t focus well. There were lots of tears and finally a chat with my Dr. who had MUCH bet­ter phone skills and made me feel MUCH better.

We met with a genetic coun­selor (which was fas­ci­nat­ing because had I not become a biol­ogy teacher, I was look­ing into genetic coun­sel­ing pro­grams) who explained every­thing & all of the options in detail. Our deci­sion was to do a detailed Level II ultra­sound at around 15 weeks to check the baby over in detail for any mark­ers of Down Syn­drome (or any other prob­lem). The tech was fab­u­lous and every­thing seemed to look good as we went through.

At the end, the Dr. came in and explained that they found no indi­ca­tions of any­thing related to any Tri­somies (it doesn’t guar­an­tee that noth­ing is wrong with the baby, but it is at least a really good sign). Thank good­ness!!! But, then, he said, it looks like some­thing might be wrong that has absolutely noth­ing to do with Down Syndrome.…“it looks like the baby has a sin­gle umbil­i­cal artery”.

This is more com­monly known as a “two-vessel cord”. Nor­mally, an umbil­i­cal cord has three vessels–two arter­ies and one vein. From the ultra­sound, it looks like this one is miss­ing an artery. It too can lead to growth issues with the baby. Because 15 weeks is so early & every­thing is still so very small, they want to do an ultra­sound around 20 weeks to check the heart in detail (a fetal echocar­dio­gram) and they will con­firm whether or not the cord is indeed two-vessel at that appoint­ment also. If the cord is two-vessel, then I will have at least 3 addi­tional ultra­sounds in the 3rd trimester to check on baby’s growth. One of my best friends is actu­ally cur­rently preg­nant with a two-vessel cord (and about to give birth), so I’m not super con­cerned about that. I know things could be so, so much worse. But, it still makes things a bit more nerve-wracking nonethe­less. We are pray­ing that every­thing looks great with the heart in a cou­ple of weeks!

Whew! Have any of you dealt with any sim­i­lar things?

Other that all of that crazi­ness, every­thing is pro­ceed­ing nor­mally for me. I’m 18 weeks right now and have hit that point where I can’t really hide it any­more, but don’t quite have that popped “bump” yet. Mater­nity clothes are a must though–especially tops. Here’s what I look like now, com­pared with what I looked like in my other preg­nan­cies at sim­i­lar stages:

It’s amaz­ing how much slower every­thing was to “pop” the first time around (and how much worse my pho­tog­ra­phy skills were–nothing like pho­tos in front of a messy bed)!! Given my his­tory, I should def­i­nitely be look­ing clearly preg­nant all of the time within the next cou­ple of weeks! Right now, we’re just look­ing for­ward to the upcom­ing ultra­sound & I’m eager to start feel­ing this lit­tle one. I have an ante­rior pla­centa this time (which from our ultra­sounds it is clear that baby likes to snug­gle with), so I won’t be able to feel any­thing until baby’s move­ments are strong enough to go through the pla­centa in addi­tion to every­thing else–my Dr. said it could be as late as 23 weeks before I start feel­ing any­thing consistent.

Wow, that was long! Thanks for read­ing! Hope­fully other updates won’t be quite as event­ful! And, after the next ultra­sound I’ll be able to share baby’s gen­der (we have a pretty good idea already, but they’ll con­firm that at the next appoint­ment also)! :)

Comments

  1. 1
    Lorie says:

    A friend of mine had a baby 3 months ago with a two-vessel cord. The baby is now 3 months old and she is beau­ti­ful and healthy! Good luck! :)

    • 2
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      Thanks, Lorie–always good to hear!! They say it occurs in less than 1% of preg­nan­cies, but I have sure heard of a lot of peo­ple recently that have expe­ri­enced it.

  2. 3
    Kathy Moore says:

    Love the upgrades in cameras!

    • 4
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      Haha–so true. I didn’t even notice at first that #1 & #2 have dif­fer­ent cam­eras! LOL! And, you can SO tell that I wasn’t blog­ging or any­thing in the first two. :) I like the qual­ity of the 3rd SO much better.

  3. 5
    Shari says:

    I have 3–1/2 yr old triplets, one of whom had a 2 ves­sel cord. I was told the 2 ves­sel cord, while uncom­mon, is not “rare”. Luck­ily I was able to hang onto them for almost 35 weeks but Zoe was still 2 lbs, 13 oz at birth. How­ever, she didn’t need any oxy­gen at birth and was oth­er­wise healthy despite being a pre­emie! Good luck to you and your baby, hope­fully the extra mon­i­tor­ing will help keep things in check and help for as good an outcome!

    • 6
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      Wow–triplets, Shari?! How spe­cial! :) Amaz­ing that you car­ried them to 35 weeks!! Thanks for shar­ing your story. Was she the small­est of the 3? Glad every­thing turned out so well.

  4. 7

    I hate that test. My bril­liant 4 year old (already read­ing and going on 24) is one that was marked as hav­ing an ele­vated risk of Downs. We did the Level II ultra­sound and they told us the same thing. Looked good, but wouldn’t make any promises. She was per­fect. I opted not to do the test w/my son. I couldn’t see the point, other than to make us stress about the pos­si­bil­ity of some­thing we couldn’t do any­thing about.

    I haven’t had any expe­ri­ence with the cord issue. I hope all is well. I do have a sis­ter that had a baby with IUGR. It was scary when he was born so tiny, but is a healthy nor­mal 11 year old now. Best wishes for the rest of your pregnancy!

    • 8
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      Thanks, Kendra! I hear ya. Not a fan of the blood test and now, in hind­sight wouldn’t have done it. Like I said, even with my back­ground, I just so naively assumed that if the ultra­sound looked ok then the blood work would be nor­mal. Dumb! We think this one is the last one, but if we were to have another, I won’t have it done next time. Glad your sister’s lit­tle one was ok even with IUGR! That can be SO scary!

  5. 9
    Angela Jacob says:

    Oh Sarah, I hope every­thing is o.k. with baby. I will pray that you find out good news next time and the baby is born healthy. Take care!!

  6. 11
    Carol Dee says:

    Oh Dear, all pre­g­na­cies come with a nor­mal amount of stess. Then to get bad news deliv­ered badly! So glad your OBGYN is so much bet­ter. Just keep tabs and moniter closely. All will be well. No mat­ter if there is an abnor­mal­ity at birth you will be pre­pared and are a FABULOUS Mom . My thoughts and prayers are with you. Try NOT to stress, rest when you can and know you are well loved.
    Hugs.…

    • 12
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      Aw, thanks Carol! Yes, he deliv­ered the news SO badly. In fact, we switched peri­na­tal cen­ters after that. Thank­fully, the new loca­tion & Dr. (and yes, my OB too) have been MUCH bet­ter!
      We’re feel­ing much bet­ter and yes, try­ing not to stress about it at all. :)

  7. 14
    Shelby Holland Rebideaux says:

    Hi Sara, I hope that every­thing turns out good for you dur­ing your preg­nancy, they are hard enough as it is! Hope every­one else is well. You have two hand­som lit­tle boys.

    - Shelby

  8. 16

    When I was preg­nant with my daugh­ter, I had ges­ta­tional dia­betes (2nd time). Because I was 37 and I could tell I was dia­betic at about 14 weeks, I was mon­i­tored by a peri­na­tol­o­gist at St. Joseph’s. I ended up hav­ing to see them every week dur­ing the third trimester, which included an ultra­sound. The best part was that I got to see my baby every week. It was a bonus I looked for­ward to, espe­cially given the cir­cum­stances. That was my bright spot. Even if you have to con­tinue with the peri­na­tol­o­gist, there’s your bonus.

    • 17
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      So true! My Dr. even said that! :) She said if the only “issue” is the cord, then they’ll just treat me like nor­mal but I’ll get to have lots of extra peeks at the baby! :)

  9. 18

    prayers for you that every­thing turns out just fine…and in the event that you are blessed with a child with needs…just know , com­ing from a mom with a son with autism, that that baby is given to you for a rea­son!! No other mama could love that baby like you could! Love and prayers! xoxo

  10. 20
    tess says:

    hope every­thing goes ok for you and baby #3…with my 2nd baby i was going to a per­in­ta­l­o­gist also and they saw 2 cyst on my babys brain– one on each side– but guess what — they popped and went away– so i dont beleive every­thing the doc­tors say any­more either…i am preggo with baby #3 — 13 weeks — i hope i dont have any scares with this one.

    good luck

    • 21
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      I’ve read about those cyts! So scary! Glad every­thing ended up being fin and good luck with baby #3! :)

  11. 22
    Briana says:

    I just stum­bled across your blog tonight. After read­ing this post, I just had to tell you I know how you feel when you got that phone call. I have two daugh­ters and my with my youngest, I got the call say­ing she had a two-vessel cord. I did what you should def. not do, which is search the inter­net. I was so upset after read­ing every­thing. But I want to encour­age you, after many ultra­sounds with my daugh­ter, who is now three, she turned out per­fectly healthy! Pray­ing for you and baby!

    • 23
      Sara @MomEndeavors says:

      Thanks, Bri­ana. So glad you stum­bled over here! :) Thanks for another pos­i­tive two-vessel cords story. Iron­i­cally, I’ve already seen every­thing on google, because one of my best friend’s found out about 4 months ago that her baby has a two-vessel cord. She was so freaked out and I did some research then. So, it was CRAZY when they men­tioned it at the ultra­sound! Every­thing has been fine for her too–just extra ultra­sounds! :)
      Glad your lit­tle one is fine! Thanks for commenting!

Speak Your Mind

*